Crossing the Threshold: Case-Based Approaches to Challenging TAVI Access Scenarios

  • Home
  • Crossing the Threshold: Case-Based Approaches to Challenging TAVI Access Scenarios
Shape Image One
Crossing the Threshold: Case-Based Approaches to Challenging TAVI Access Scenarios

Crossing the Threshold: Case-Based Approaches to Challenging TAVI Access Scenarios

In the modern era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), access is everything. As device profiles shrink and indications expand to younger, lower-risk patients, the anatomical and technical complexities of vascular access remain one of the most critical—and underappreciated—determinants of procedural success and safety.

While transfemoral access remains the default for most TAVI procedures, many patients present with challenging iliofemoral anatomy, severe calcification, tortuosity, or previous vascular interventions that make the pathway far from straightforward.

This blog explores practical, case-based strategies for navigating these challenges, and when it may be time to switch to alternative routes.

Case 1: Severe Calcified Iliacs, Narrow Lumen

Scenario:
80-year-old female with symptomatic aortic stenosis. CTA reveals heavy bilateral circumferential calcification of common and external iliac arteries with minimal luminal diameter <5.5 mm.

Challenges:

  • Risk of rupture or dissection
  • Difficulty with sheath advancement
  • Inadequate expansion of closure devices

Solution Options:

  • Pre-dilation with high-pressure balloon angioplasty
  • Use of low-profile TAVI systems (14 Fr equivalent)
  • Bilateral approach with staged iliac stenting pre-TAVI
  • Consider transcaval access if no femoral option exists

Clinical Tip: In patients with hostile iliacs, pre-procedural ballooning can sometimes create just enough room—provided the vessel is not brittle with concentric calcium.

Case 2: Tortuosity and Kinking in Pelvic Vessels

Scenario:
Male patient, 75, with known peripheral vascular disease. CTA shows severe S-shaped kinking of external iliac arteries bilaterally.

Challenges:

  • Difficulty in sheath tracking
  • Higher risk of sheath kinking and delivery system misalignment
  • Potential for procedural delay or device dislodgement

Solution Options:

  • Stiff buddy wires to straighten vessels (e.g., Lunderquist)
  • Ipsilateral balloon-assisted tracking
  • Contralateral snaring for added support
  • Switch to transaxillary or transcarotid route if tortuosity is severe

Clinical Tip: Avoid over-rotating the delivery system in tortuous vessels—this increases the risk of arterial injury and embolization.

Case 3: Previous Aorto-Femoral Bypass Graft

Scenario:
A 78-year-old male with prior aorto-bifemoral bypass. No native access due to complete occlusion of native iliac vessels.

Challenges:

  • Inability to access true arterial pathway
  • Bypass graft may not support large sheath insertion
  • Unclear track for valve positioning

Solution Options:

  • Transcarotid or axillary approach via surgical cutdown
  • Direct aortic access (especially in those with prior bypasses)
  • Transapical TAVI in select centers, though declining in use

Clinical Tip: Always perform a detailed CTA with 3D reconstruction in patients with prior vascular surgery. Understand the graft configuration thoroughly before choosing access.

Decision-Making Framework for Access Strategy

Anatomic Challenge

Preferred Response

Minimal femoral diameter <5.5 mm

Low-profile system, pre-dilation, alternate access

Severe iliac calcification

Balloon pre-dilatation, consider transcaval

Tortuous iliac arteries

Buddy wire, stiff wire support, transaxillary

Prior vascular grafts

Transcarotid or direct aortic

Aortic aneurysm or dissection

Avoid transfemoral, consider axillary or apical

Bilateral access not feasible

Use single-side access with contralateral support

 

Evolving Techniques & Tools

  • Transcaval access: A promising option in patients with no femoral route, allowing controlled crossing from IVC to aorta with plug closure post-procedure.
  • Ultrasound-guided femoral puncture: Reduces complications in calcified or scarred groins.
  • Vascular closure advancements: Devices like MANTA and PerQseal are designed for large-bore closure, even in challenging anatomies.

Beyond Anatomy: Patient-Centered Access Planning

Always consider:

  • Antiplatelet/anticoagulation status
  • Body habitus (especially for transaxillary or carotid)
  • History of stroke, carotid stenosis
  • Operator and institutional expertise in alternative access

A good access plan is not only anatomically feasible—it is procedurally safe, logistically realistic, and patient appropriate.

Final Thought: The Access Route Sets the Tone

A perfect valve deployment means little if the access fails.
Bleeding, dissection, and conversion to open repair all contribute significantly to morbidity in TAVI.

Great operators don’t just deploy valves—they build secure paths to get there.

At TriVasc Academy, we emphasize not only cutting-edge valve technologies, but also mastery of foundational access techniques. Because crossing the threshold safely is the first—and most crucial—step toward successful valve therapy.

Coming Soon on TriVasc Academy
Access planning checklists, CTA interpretation guides, and hands-on simulation modules for transfemoral, transcaval, and transaxillary approaches.

The content provided in this article and throughout the Trivasc Academy platform is intended for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, nor is it intended to replace the clinical judgment of qualified healthcare professionals. All clinical decisions—especially those concerning patient care, procedural planning, or surgical interventions—must be made by board-certified and appropriately credentialed medical practitioners based on their own professional expertise, institutional protocols, and applicable regional regulations.

While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy, currency, and relevance of the information presented, Trivasc Academy makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the completeness, applicability, or clinical appropriateness of the content. We assume no responsibility or liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential harm, loss, or damage resulting from the use of any information or guidance provided herein.

Trivasc Academy does not endorse any specific device, technology, or clinical approach mentioned unless explicitly stated, and any reference to commercial products or services is for educational illustration only. Readers are strongly encouraged to consult official guidelines, product IFUs, and institutional policies before implementing any technique or procedure discussed on this site.

Use of this website and its content constitutes agreement to these terms. For full legal terms, please refer to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

TriVasc Academy is a medical education platform dedicated to advancing the understanding and treatment of peripheral, neurovascular, and cardiac intervention.

Address

© 2025 TriVasc Academy. All content Copyrighted. All trademarks reserved.